FACTS/ISSUES: Plaintiff’s former loan servicer, Statebridge Company, LLC, increased Plaintiff’s monthly mortgage payments at a time not provided for within the loan agreement. Due to the increased payments, Plaintiff was put into default on her loan. Plaintiff filed the lawsuit to stop the foreclosure. RESOLUTION: Pending.
Consumer Action Law Group Ongoing Cases
DORAME V. JP MORGAN CHASE, ET. AL. (DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES COURTHOUSE- CASE NO. BC501701)
Facts/Issues Plaintiffs were in review for a loan modification when their home was foreclosed on. Plaintiffs filed their lawsuit based on Homeowners Bill of Rights Violations. Resolution LAWSUIT IS ONGOING
CARRILLO V. CHASE, WELLS FARGO, ET. AL. (BAKERSFIELD COURTHOUSE- CASE NO. S-1500-C V-279131)
Facts/Issues Plaintiff spent the last five (5) years trying working with Chase in an attempt to modify her loan. During this time, Plaintiff entered into repayment plans and trial modification plans making payments to Chase. Upon completion of a trial modification, Chase informed Plaintiff they could not modify her loan because the home was foreclosed […]
Our Mortgage Attorney Helps Clients Fight Against Big Loan Lenders Such as Wells Fargo
At Consumer Action Law Group, our mortgage attorney has helped many clients win foreclosure cases against loan lenders such as Wells Fargo. If you feel that you have been wronged by a mortgage loan lender similar to the case below, contact our attorney today at (818) 254-8413 to see how we can help you. MILLER V. […]
MULLIGAN V ONEWEST, ET.AL. (TORRANCE COURTHOUSE- YC069397)
Plaintiffs spent 3 years in modification review. Their lender continued to request the same documents over and over again. After 3 years of review with…
VELEK V. NATIONSTAR, ET. AL. (VENTURA COUNTY- CASE NO. 56-2014-00450228-C U-OR-VTA)
Plaintiffs submitted a modification package to be reviewed by the lender. The lender took so long to review Plaintiffs’ application that the added arrears…
ARMOR V. BANK OF AMERICA, ET. AL. (SAN FRANCISCO- CASE NO. CGC 12 523629)
Facts/Issues Plaintiff submitted a modification package to be reviewed for the Making Home Affordable Modification Program. The lender took so long to review Plaintiff’s application that the added arrears to Plaintiff’s loan balance made Plaintiff ineligible for the HAMP modification. Resolution LAWSUIT IS ONGOING
DANIEL V. ONEWEST ET. AL. (CASE NO. MC023824)
Plaintiff inherited property from his mother and obtained a loan from Indymac shortly thereafter. Plaintiff paid his property taxes directly to…
DANIEL V. CHASE ET. AL. (CASE NO. BC460007)
Plaintiff inherited a home from his mother and obtained a loan from Washington Mutual shortly thereafter. Plaintiff paid his property taxes directly to the…
WASHINGTON V. OCWEN, ET. AL.
Plaintiff is a 99 year old woman. After the passing of her husband, she received a permanent modification from her lender. Ocwen improperly escrowed her…
LUU V. CHASE, SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, ET. AL. (CASE NO. VC063929)
Plaintiff was always current on his mortgage payments. Plaintiff received letters and statements from Chase stating he had $33,000 in his escrow account…
